Die Augenzeugenbericht stammen von vielen verschiedenen Frauen, entsprechend unterschiedlich lesen sie sich auch. Die Frauen wurden nach Aussage einer Patientin schlimmer behandelt als Verbrecher: Most criminals have some sort of a trial before they are punished; but here, all that is required, is the misrepresentation of an angry attendant, who thus secures to her helpless victim the punishment, which her own conduct justly merits upon herself (Seite 62) Die Beschreibungen der teilweise gänzlich unwissenschaftlichen Behandlungsmethoden sind kaum zu ertragen: Based on the unfounded assumptions that psychiatric illness resulted from gynecological disease, these treatments were directed at womens reproductive organs Other women were subject to electrical charges applied to the uterus (Seite 100-101) Es wird noch schlimmer, aber das möchte ich euch an dieser Stelle ersparen. Das aufschlussreiche Buch endet mit einem Epilog, in dem die Autoren feststellen, dass die Zustände in psychiatrischen Kliniken heute keineswegs bestens sind und geben entsprechende Beispiele.
Geller and Maxine Harris have presented one of the first books of its kind here, bringing together the voice of women who were incarcerated in American institutions against their will over a 105-year period, and giving them 'the opportunity to speak for themselves'. Geller and Harris also discuss their decision to split the period up into smaller chunks due to shifting moral and social conditions in the United States. The twentieth-century women are keen observers of human nature and asylum abuse - but they have no universal frame of reference. As one would expect, I'm sure, some incredibly shocking accounts are presented here; for instance, the way in which 'any sign of economic independence or simple human pride in a woman could be used against her, both legally and psychiatrically.' There was also the fear that an individual would be driven to become mad solely due to her incarceration, or that she would remain in an asylum indefinitely, with no hope of ever escaping.
I couldn't believe that the majority of the women in the Asylum's (judging by the women's stories and history of the time) were just put there by their husbands/family for expressing views that were different from what was acceptable at the time or because they were believers in a different religion than their families. The authors did a really good job in this book of giving the reader a good, brief overview of the history of the time. I thought that the history of the time allowed the reader to better understand the stories that were in the book.
The mere fact that the medical society thought that simply having a uterus was enough to cause mental illness is astounding and sickening at the same time. The book doesnt tell you if any of these women were actually mentally ill. Unfortunately, you dont find out what happened to most of these women after reading their horror stories.
We still have a long way to go in understanding (and defining) mental illness, and in not confusing it with social dissent (don't get me started).
This book features excerpts from publications written by women who had been institutionalised in insane asylums over a hundred year period, with each time period preceded by a short introduction giving an overview of the general state of mental healthcare at the time. These are only a handful of cases, written by the women who were well enough to tell their stories.
First-person written narratives from women committed to insane asylums does not make for easy reading.
The other comments on here are correct - the editors are definitely focused on affluent (and very literate) white women.
The book features 26 first hand accounts of different women considered mad or insane, spanning two centuries, from 1840-1945.